I gave a long reply and no doubt she will wonder why such
a seemingly innocuous quotation resulted in such a strong opinion, and no doubt
this opinion will anger those brought up on the Shiny Picture of the Beginning
of American History that we've all been fed since Kindergarten. My opinion
touches such sore nerves, not because it’s anti-American or unpatriotic, but
because it’s informed and doesn't fit
the Shiny Picture everyone believes is incontrovertible truth.
Before I delve into my opinion, what does this Shiny
Picture consist of? 1) the Puritans, also known as the Pilgrims, were the
victims of the evil King of England and came to America in a last ditch effort
to live their lives in religious and political freedom. 2) The Pilgrims were
God-fearing people who threw a big “thanksgiving” feast and invited their
Indian neighbors to share in their bounty. (The pictures we’re shown as
children, if you remember, the ones that form the foundation of our
understanding of this era, depict happy, smiling Pilgrims and Indians sitting at
a long table, eating, laughing, and getting along marvelously.) 3) The Pilgrims
minded their own business, but just as the settlers were getting used to their
new-found freedom, the greedy King of England decides to tighten his
choke-hold, leading to the skirmishes between the most powerful army in the
world and a bunch of poor, abused Americans just struggling to make a living
under a heavy burden of taxes.
This, in a nutshell, is the Shiny Picture of the
Beginning of American History. Starting in junior high, your education in
history repeats this Shiny Picture, spends months on the Revolution era, and progresses
in rapid brevity to end right before the Civil War and summer vacation. This
pattern continues throughout high school. (In fact, I hardly knew anything about history during and after
the Civil War because no class ever seemed to get that far. I was in college before
I’d heard of Lincoln’s attack on habeas corpus, McCarthism, Henry Kissinger
blunders in Cambodia, or Julius and Ethel Rosenburg.)
But I digress. In regards to my comment on the
aforementioned quotation, about the first settlers, I wasn’t talking about
Columbus, as my friend supposed. Columbus, after all, wasn’t a settler but an
adventurer/explorer. The central reasons the first settlers in what is now known as the United States of America migrated
was for wealth and power. The Puritans weren't as politically/religiously
oppressed in England as everyone thinks they were. The Puritan ideology had a
LOT of political power in England. (Who do you think financed the migrations
and finagled the charters?) In fact, one of the reasons for shipping Puritan
settlers over here was to spread Puritan power to this new, resource-rich land
to continue to threaten the strength of the King and Company. (And the King's
followers shipped over their own settlers to threaten the power of the
Puritans. It was a chess game.)
To gain this foothold, however, willing bodies were needed
to venture into a virtually unknown and alien territory full of cannibalistic
savages. To counter this widespread idea of a dangerous place full of death and
far from the reach of all that is civilized, the idea of ‘freedom from the King’s
oppression’ was sold to the lower classes to get them shipped over here.* It
took a while for the ill-prepared Pilgrims to stop starving long enough to
prosper, but once they did, they built up their base of power, and the wealth they
derived from it, with a grisly vengeance. With the support of the Puritan power
base in Mother England, the American contingent was able to become an almost
unstoppable force, so blood- and land-thirsty, non-Puritan settlements took on
the attitude of ‘stay far away and try not to piss them off too badly and maybe
they’ll leave us alone’. (They didn't.)
The pitiful story
of shamefully abused and innocent Christians in search of respite, however, has
stuck. The full details of the initial settling of America don't give people
warm fuzzies and a sense of righteous superiority. In fact, it’s quite the
opposite. So we hold up this vague idea
of ‘freedom from tyrants’ and skip over the details that make us face the uncomfortable
truth that doesn't mesh with our Shiny Picture.
Instead, we focus on the Revolution era, where we take
the justifications for treasonously rebelling against the government and use it
to gloss over the reasons we set foot on the continent in the first place, as
well as the things that happened once our feet touched soil. Don't get me
wrong, I enjoy the political ideology of the Revolution era and can get just as
much caught up in the excitement of David kicking Goliath's trash as the next
person. England was too comfortable in its own Shiny Picture and paid the price.
However, I don't much care for the use of borderline jingoistic platitudes
that, whether in ignorance or not, completely dismiss or purposely manipulate
the facts of history.
Eighteenth Century America, the Articles of
Confederation, and later the Constitution and Bill of Rights, were based on
divinely inspired ideas, but this doesn't mean we can overlook the greedy,
blood soaked foundation they were built upon. Looking back, we can see how the
Puritan personality of ‘I’m right and everyone else will burn in hell
especially you Kingy’ was watered down, mixed with other influences, and morphed
into the spirit that fed Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, but this in no way
excuses the Puritan’s secular reasons for building their little empire, nor the
evils they perpetrated to achieve their ends.
In fact, understanding the sordid and wonderful history
of the country is one of the points of an Independence Day celebration. Being
reminded of exactly where this
country started, where it’s been and what it’s done is supposed to give us not
only pride in our history, but a renewed determination to build on the past and
become better than our forefathers. Not more powerful, not more wealthy, but
genuinely better. To rephrase something
Dinesh O’Souza said, the shape of the future is most affected by the debts and
actions, both good and bad, of the past. If we don’t truly understand the good,
bad, and ugly of our history and instead continue to uphold an incomplete Shiny
Picture, we will be little better than Icarus, glorying in our fragile strength and freedom and killing ourselves in the process.
*I acknowledge the
fact that there were individual Puritan settlers who truly believed in moving
to the New World to worship as they pleased. I speak more on the widespread
belief that this was the only and pure reason for Puritan migration and that
therefore we ought to hold them up as some sort of holy paradigm. I also note
that the settlements of Maryland, Virginia, New York and Maine had quite a different
sort of settler and history. These other settlers really did ‘cross the
Atlantic to find soil for their ploughs’. Liberty for the soul had little, if nothing, to
do with it.
1 comment:
Nice job! I had to look up about 10 words you used. You are a great writer.
Early Colonial history in North America kinda reminds me of the Old Testament at times.
Post a Comment